impressions are not always as strong and as accurate as we caused the 11-M
. Sometimes I think we are victims of terrorism, sometimes I think that is self-justification to think so. I must confess that hypnosis intensity generated by the attack of 11-M has varied at different times, modulated by events, sadly
A date that began to mark time and virulence new information, was the
July 7 , 2005, when Islamist attack in London (
there if they had suicidal ).
In December 2005, a sinister
Rubalcaba was open to negotiations on the Statute of Catalonia, on 30 March approved the Statute of Catalonia and June 18 was submitted to a referendum. Here were months of hard struggle for freedom.
Black Pawns platform was made known on the street in the expression of AVT on 10 June. On July 6, 2006, Judge Del Olmo
closed the investigation into the 11M a year after the bombing of London. In Barcelona, \u200b\u200bthe black laborers took to the streets on September 11, 2006. In December, ETA
Barajas kill again.
31 October 2007, the judge dictated
Bermúdez
sentence.
From March 11, 2004 to the ballot of the March 9, 2008, stained by blood shed
by ETA-
four years of absolute anarchy promoted by the Government of Spain. But worse was to come after the electoral defeat of the PP
.
The same March 9
asked me for change of direction imposed by Mariano Rajoy in the People's Party from the 11-M. Later we witnessed
stunned output scene Zaplana and Acebes, the PP output of Ortega Lara, María
contempt San Gil ...
Are they also victims of 11-M? ... at least, are involved in a crisis
.
The lack of consistency in this
open crisis was revealed as red cherry pride in
libel trial against Federico Jimenez Losantos.
From here all our support to the journalist. Mr. Ruiz Gallardón alias 'Ambitions', has made a mistake whose consequences are to be valued properly in the future, we can now make political fiction.
It seems as if the 11-M, have become a black seagull
accompanying the PP at the time and always with negative results: For the March 11 elections were lost March 14, 2004, perhaps not struggle enough in this case are lost in the 9-M, and sure, that after the moral bankruptcy
produced by the obtuse and selfish complaint against Losantos Gallardón be lost quite a few polls.
The title '
Ambitions' sums it up. Gallardon has put him above the principles of freedom of expression and information; over the few resources that have supported the PP, and above the interests of his party to look for enemies where none exist, and above the victims who continue to support FJL; over voters in his party FJL also share opinion., has put in a chute to the PP leaders who have had to testify at the trial ... But more serious is that with its stubborn strategy brings
'priceless' collaboration in the destruction of Spain, which in the last legislature have defended million English' in the street. " We have always said the 11-M was committed to change the political direction of Spain, now we must conclude that in addition, four years later, 11-M has led to lay the foundations for the defense of the English nation, is decoherence
annulled by ideological the main party of the nationalist right, now in opposition.
The Popular Party, which will come to Congress in June
in deplorable conditions, has failed, or unwilling, to accept the electoral result of the 9-M as a challenge that led to the consolidation their ideological positions. On the other hand, definitely seems to be away from some of its principles. With the dust is rising, this will cost a good number of votes that will be very difficult to recover. Once removed from the glue that linked all the sensitivities of PP voters, building bricks are falling loose and eventually detached.
This irresponsibility, lack of political calculation or take the PSOE to power for many years. Posts in this situation, the question arises
:
Are
PP leaders willing to sacrifice their 'armchairs' in the Spain of the English?
With the surrender and abandonment of the ambition to rule Do they weigh more than the personalities that the idea of \u200b\u200ban alternative strong and cohesive government?
Could it be that in the previous legislature, the PP today, walked in the trailer part of social movements, and concealed their true tendencies?
Do voters of PP in the past, we have replaced by desires realities, seeking chimera of critical thinking and straight?.
I and I have some answers and I do not like
0 comments:
Post a Comment