|
Wednesday, July 8, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7142. COMMENTS
LIBERAL OPINION
CNI papers on the 11-M Federico Jiménez Losantos the widespread corruption of the breed policy and the profound disappointment that has gripped the voters do not appear in any survey, because nobody asks for them. No illusion is voted at the polls, true, but neither is anyone on the left-and right- to convince citizens to clean up public life to the Treasury Police, Justice and the autonomous municipalities. assumes the corruption of institutions, which survives who best meets landscape so mean, to report the looting of the treasury when and a half million unemployed and not receiving even a single euro of aid is a waste of time, seek justice is not quixotic but idiots.
The PSOE has money to mount floats in the Gay Pride parade, but Griñán Caritas aid freeze, although in Andalusia has been dubbed the dining and lodging needs. For MATSA Chaves There are grants, missing more. For soup kitchens, no. Political priority calls that figure.
And yet, nothing more priority to stop the practice of neglecting the poor and mock the taxpayer. Nothing is more urgent than to persuade young people that all that is dirty can be cleaned. But hopes for change in politics come from the hand of the opposition, not the government of Aznar and the PP who led the opposition to Gonzalez Rajoy it should do the same with ZP, the difference is huge.
Proof: Aznar said that if he declassifying and give La Moncloa the judges CESID papers on the GAL. Then did not keep his promise or let the judges met him, but there was a promise and, therefore, hope. Rajoy no one has bothered to explain to the public the need to declassify the CNI secret papers on the 11-M. That there are, no doubt, because someone had to inform the King and Government Information on the monstrous fraud and systematic destruction of evidence of the slaughter.
Saiz has grown more silence than tomatoes. But Sanz Roldán and clans of CNI and documents should be declassified over the fourth frame and other criminal plots which allowed up to Dezcallar concealment. For Rajoy, following a complaint from the victims of 11-M against Manzano, must request such clearance. It is more important than what's Camps.
Thursday, July 9, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7143 EDITION: MADRID
EDITORIAL OPINION
The 11-M is back in the hands of justice
coincidentally matching two legal actions in time to have revived legal proceedings on the 11-M. The first is the civil suit filed by Commissioner Sánchez Manzano Against The World, has taken this request to submit new documents, testimony and forensic evidence to substantiate the serious errors committed by the former head of the EOD. Our newspaper has had access to those documents of indisputable public interest for weeks, and in some cases for months, but "out of respect for the judicial function, decided not to reveal its contents until after the taking of evidence at the hearing. The second of these legal proceedings is the filing of a criminal complaint by the Association Assistance to the Victims of 11-M against Sanchez Manzano for three alleged crimes in the investigation of the Madrid bombings, as announced in our newspaper on Monday.
The first of the documents produced by the world in the hearing yesterday was a letter from the Directorate General of Police finds that "the examination and study of explosives corresponds exclusively to the Forensic Science Laboratory." Sánchez Manzano avoided this obligation in the biggest attack in history although, in a period of six years, this laboratory had tested 116 samples of explosives, according to another official report.
Two experts from the Guardia Civil, with a long history of service, testified before the judge that they had not given "the nod" to the analysis made on 11-M in the laboratory of the EOD. To which is added the testimony of expert witnesses and Romero Iglesias, describing it as "aberrant and negligent" such analysis.
addition, the world bring to court an expert opinion shows that Sanchez Manzano did not tell the truth when he said that the mobile phone Trium 110, found in the backpack of Vallecas, stored in his memory the date and time for which he was scheduled. That is impossible because This model deletes the stored data to be exhausted or removed the battery, as it happened.
This reinforces the suspicion that the police investigation was handled and aimed to bolster a preconceived hypothesis. Sánchez Manzano could be a key part in this plot, since their negligence and misrepresentations are otherwise inexplicable.
The criminal complaint from the Association of Victims Support complaint seven disappearances of material collected by the EOD at the scene of the attacks. In particular, rocks of the platform to all stations, some of the samples of Atocha, the remains of one of the foci Téllez street, sand and earth and other elements that do not know where they are. After a thorough
action Sanchez Manzano, prosecutors accuse him of failing to prosecute crimes by the concealment of such evidence of concealment by the delay in the investigation and that false testimony under oath that he never traces of explosives sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory and to justify its reference to "nitroglycerin" as a generic reference unlikely to dynamite.
At this point, it is now very clear that manipulated Manzano and obstructed the investigation into the 11-M. We do not know is why. That's what the courts should determine whether the complaint is admissible and begins to investigate the chain of negligence and omissions of the Commissioner is responsible.
Thursday, July 9, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7143 EDITION: MADRID SPAIN
11-M / Back in court
Dynamite CSU should analyze the Interior
EOD confirms that they have to send all samples of explosives
JOAQUIN MANSO
Madrid The exclusive jurisdiction for the "consideration", the "study" and "analysis" of "samples of explosives" that are behind a terrorist attack is for the Scientific Police. The document clarifies that has brought the Police Department at the request of THE WORLD. The EOD, under the responsibility of Sánchez Manzano, that unit did not send debris collected in the pockets of the explosions, which prevented them hiciesen scientific analysis until the presiding judge of the 11-M, Javier Gómez Bermúdez, ordered that it be carried out. Three years after the attack.
The document sets out the Police Internal Circular No. 50, "in which records the protocol in case of terrorist attacks." "With regard to the Scientific Police, specifies that: 'It falls, exclusively, examination, study, collection of any vestiges, remnants, samples of explosives, etc., contained in the scene'" he says. And further clarifies: "The jurisdiction of the analysis of these substances [those listed after an attack] is in the field of the Scientific Police. "
This paper also presented a copy of the regulation of the EOD, which insists that the analysis of the bomb disposal technicians will result in "technical and expert reports," but that will be the Central Service of the Scientific Police issued the "technical and scientific reports."
In fact, the usual formula with which they operate in an attack on the EOD is an initial cursory examination of the remains that serves to direct the police investigation first, and then forwarded to the Forensic Science techniques to deepen scientific evidence in a trial. And it shows another report submitted by the Ministry of Interior: the bomb disposal unit sent to the Commissioner General of the Scientific Police no less than 116 samples collected in attacks from 2000 to October 2006. This range covers most of the time spent Sánchez Manzano in front of the EOD, was appointed in 2002 and dismissed by Rubalcaba in December 2006.
However, just after the biggest attack in the history of Spain, the remains of the bulbs were not sent to the Forensic Science. And that the analysis conducted by the 11-M the chemical analysis of the EOD expert gave an almost zero for the purposes of research - "generic components of dynamite" - because, as acknowledged by the former chief commissioner Judge Del Olmo two years after , his lab had no technical means.
At the hearing held yesterday, in addition, Apple tried to detract from his signature to the footnote to the analysis. He noted that he only gave them the "clearance". To be valid before a court, such reports of the explosives must be signed by at least two chemical experts or experts in that field. The former chief of the EOD is not, and in his laboratory had only a professional it was.
Thursday, July 9, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7143 EDITION: MADRID SPAIN 11-M / Back in court THE WORLD provides further evidence against Manzano to answer their demand Former chief commissioner EOD considered injured his honor and claims 300,000 euros. The documents and testimony corroborate the information provided of this newspaper Madrid Joaquin MANSO the world bring today in a Madrid court new evidence to corroborate their information and critical views on the actions of former police chief of the EOD Juan Jesus Sanchez Manzano in the investigation of 11-M. These documents, testimony and expert opinions presented at the first session of the trial on the complaint filed by former police officer against this newspaper.
This newspaper has had access to these tests for weeks, months in some cases, but respect for court action decided not to reveal until the time of his practice in the trial. Manzano considers
injured his honor and claim € 300,000 in total to the director of THE WORLD, Peter J. Ramirez, his deputy Casimiro García-Abadilla, the chief editor and columnist Fernando Mugica Federico Jiménez Losantos, and severally PUBLISHING UNIT.
The main changes are contained in a report by the Directorate General of Police that specifies that the Scientific Police, not the EOD, which has exclusive jurisdiction to "review and study of Samples of explosives "that are collected after an attack, in an office of Interior detailing the EOD were 116 times between 2000 and 2006 which did precisely the 11-M: Scientific Police send samples of explosives, and in an expert to certify that the phone was found in the backpack of Vallecas lose the date and time if you remove the battery, so it becomes impossible for the information provided on this point Manzano Judge Juan del Olmo. Yesterday
also testified two former Civil Guard EOD and two chemists who participated in the analysis of explosives. Before I had made two journalists WORLD. Manzano's lawyer asked them about the information that revealed that former chief of the EOD Del Olmo had provided the false information that methenamine that appeared in the analysis of dynamite found in the Kangoo was a staple of the Goma 2 Eco and his knowledge of the protocol would force the EOD to send samples to the Forensic Science explosive. He also asked about the decision making process of the Drafting Committee.
The two 'EOD'
At the hearing said two police officers with decades of service in the 'EOD'. LMB
LAM and explained that they had never given its approval to an analysis like the one signed 11-M Manzano and then sent to Del Olmo, which is not spelled out the components of dynamite found.
said that this omission prevented from deciding on the research and never in all his experience, had seen a report.
Thursday, July 9, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7143 EDITION: MADRID SPAIN 11-M / Back in court One opinion holds that the former head of the EOD data gave the judge a impossible stated that the mobile Vallecas backpack had "real time" when he lit JOAQUIN MANSO Madrid
THE WORLD presented yesterday at the Court of First Instance number 56 in Madrid, where he holds the trial on the complaint of former police chief EOD Juan Jesús Sánchez Manzano against this newspaper, an expert opinion signed by an engineer of the ICAI which concludes that the phone Mitsubishi Trium 110 Pedro took the EOD of Vallecas backpack on the morning of March 12, 2004 will inevitably lose the date and time if you remove the battery. This result is inconsistent with the report provided to the investigating judge Manzano of 11 in November 2005, as reported by this newspaper in its day. Manzano
detailing the judge that "when it came to the study of the phone, it's time coincided with the real and had activated the alarm functions (7.40) and vibrator." This data was collected Del Olmo in their cars and prosecutor Olga Sanchez in his final letter of accusation.
However, the EOD Pedro testified at the trial of 11-M that "the phone was off" and that when deactivated the bomb bag, moved to the complex of the Scientific Police in Madrid's Canillas. "Once there, the phone is removed, remove the card [...]», said.
To remove the SIM card, it is inevitable to have previously removed the battery. According to the opinion provided by this newspaper, the video that accompanies a detailed explanation of the procedure carried out by the engineer, then lost the time and date. Therefore, when the EOD rekindled the terminal, with a new SIM card, the Trium 110 could not show in any case, the 'real time'.
Police sources confirmed that if the EOD had on the phone with the original SIM card left by terrorists, which then precipitated the arrest of Jamal Zougam, "had disappeared from his memory the data from the BTS-repeater-in which first turned the phone. Just to keep this information that helped find the house of Morata de Tajuña which were mounted pumps, it was decided to remove the card before you activate the phone.
The engineer carried out the process with a 110 Trium silver, blue and dark gray, with full battery and a card company Movistar. After checking all these points were functioning properly and were suitable for the realization of the opinion, the technician turned on the terminal and entered the secret code (PIN). Then made a call, stored in the phone two numbers and programmed the clock to make sure everything was fine.
then set the time and date. Randomly fixed the 11.11 am on November 11, 2011, and saw on the screen that the phone had been configured correctly. That day will be Friday.
engineer then went out and pulled the battery terminal and the Movistar SIM card, which replaced by another company Orange. Performed the same checks again, turned on the phone. And when the screen lit up, "the phone is lost before the date set [...]. It is found that the default date given by telephone is [...]. 01/01/2001 The phone also has lost the time. The phone displays the idle screen with 00.00 Mon 01 ".
addition, the expert conclusions included in an extract from the instructions of Trium 110 in that it warns that this would happen.
Thursday, July 9, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7143 EDITION: MADRID SPAIN 11-M / Back in court Analyses of 11-M were "aberrant" and "negligent"
JOAQUÍN MANSO
Madrid
Los peritos químicos independientes Antonio Iglesias y Carlos Romero Batallán, que participaron en los análisis de los explosivos ordenados por el tribunal del 11-M, declararon que los análisis realizados por la perito de los Tedax a las pocas horas de los atentados fueron «aberrantes» y «negligentes» por no especificar los «componentes genéricos» de la dinamita encontrada.
Los dos expertos fueron citados para refutar la tesis de Manzano de que los resultados de la pericia llevada a cabo tres años después de la matanza le dan la razón, porque sus resultados coincidirían substantially with the analysis that he signed the 11-M.
Churches and Romero noted that the performance of the expert witness violated the EOD basic scientific protocols by not writing the analytical report indicating the components and discard the solution that had been washed samples, with the aggravating circumstance that the remains of explosions were of negligible size and there was no possibility of getting others had not been washed.
Thursday, July 9, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7143 EDITION: MADRID SPAIN 11-M / Back to the courts The seven 'disappearances' of Manzano Help Association 11-M submitted the complaint against commissioner
MANUEL Marraco
Madrid
The omission of the duty to prosecute crimes, concealment and suppression of evidence and perjury allegedly committed by the chief of the EOD in the 11-M are from yesterday seal input in the magistrates court in Madrid.
The lawsuit filed by the Association to Aid Victims of 11-M against the commissioner Juan Jesus Sanchez Manzano and chemical expert under his command maintains that the performance of both "impeded" the investigation of the slaughter and "helped in one way effective part of its authors ", besides forcing the court that tried the slaughter to stamp this phrase in his statement:" It is not known with absolute certainty the brand of dynamite exploded on trains. "
The statement of the association headed by LA Dominguez reviewed the collection of samples reported by EOD operators in the trial and compares with what came at the hands of experts appointed by the court official. The result is seven disappearances of those responsible for Manzano and the expert:
1. In general, the stones have disappeared on the platform, and the cotton with water and acetone, according to the chief inspector with professional card 28296 - were collected on all trains.
2. Samples have been preserved in the Atocha station are surprisingly small for the magnitude of events (focus number 1, for example, have been preserved only three screws).
3. Gone are all traces of one of the focuses of the street Téllez.
4. Focus Téllez No. 3 all traces have disappeared, except for a measly nail.
5. Gone are the samples of sand, soil, cotton, water and acetone than 35,690 card holders EOD officer claimed to have collected in the Téllez train.
6. Gone are the soil samples were taken from the crater of the controlled explosion of El Pozo, as shown in the photograph of the folio of volume 145 of 53,835 11-M summary.
7. Gone are the samples of fabric, insulation and earth than 17,632 expert said he had received in his laboratory and analyzed on 11 March morning. "
to have had all the material from scratch, according to the lawsuit, the CSU would have to analyze and detect foreign substances to the Goma 2 ECO allegedly used, which would have opened new avenues of research. "The defendants, through its work to hinder the investigation into the explosive 11-M, helped in an efficient way to their authors (and in particular, which provided for the commission Titadyn dynamite), and from preventing March 2004 could open the lines of relevant research, "says the complaint. "This work", he adds, "continues to this day", as still missing the "kilos and kilos" of clues that a dozen EOD assured the court that had collected in the 12 outbreaks of the slaughter. Aid Association requests the court that, after admitting the complaint admissible, summoned to give evidence to several of these EOD.
That and other measures sought by the lawyer José María de Pablo seek to proved that, in a first phase, the defendants concealed from the Forensic Science remnants of the explosions, which later got rid of the vast majority of the remains and, finally, truthfully before the court the 11-M when they tried to justify its actions. Visit
before the National Court
'Disappearances' arrival yesterday at the Plaza de Castilla courts are already in the Audiencia Nacional. Last March, on behalf of Gabriel Moris, a victim of M11 and the court expert, attorney Manuela Rubio requested the reopening of the case based on statements from 'EOD' and things like the picture here reproduced, showing remains a collection that never came to court. Without naming names, also asked Judge Eloy Velasco sought the person responsible for the disappearance of many traces.
Thursday, July 9, 2009. Year XXI. Number: 7143 EDITION: MADRID SPAIN 11-M / Back to the courts The prosecutor appeals the ruling that freed 10 Islamists The Office National Court has approached the Supreme Court appeal against the decision by the so-called 'Operation Tigris', which resulted in the acquittal 10 of the 14 accused of helping escape to some authors the 11-M, to understand that the court did not assess all the evidence given at trial. In a report submitted to the Supreme Prosecutor's Office has had access to Efe, the National Court prosecutor Dolores Delgado believes it is bringing an appeal this ruling by the Second Criminal Section, notified on May 12, because is sufficiently "motivated" and suffers, therefore, of "negligent failure or inconsistency short."
According to the prosecutor, the court, which led to their decision to acquit the defendants most of the unlawfulness of the intervention emails, and criticized Delgado had "provided evidence relevant" but "mere assertions, did not take into account the alternative qualification of collaborating with a terrorist who proposed to the defendants Siti Bilal, Mustafa Mohamed and Abdelmalik Abdeselam Abselam amak.
At the offices of the three were found weapons, ammunition, ski masks, handcuffs and a tape in which we hear phrases like "East and West need to know that we are terrorists and that we fear, and you have to make anything panic. Terrorism is a must in the religion of God. "
All these elements, the prosecutor continued, "allowed the less establish a rating of collaboration to be realized in the concealment of weapons and the fellowship 'jihadists'."
"Far even analyze that material evidence from the perspective of terrorist collaboration, the Board merely states the facts proved that: 'There is no evidence that those were part of any organization,' 'terrorist' is totally silent on collaborative legal alternative "regrets Delgado.
|
|
